FLM films - My Webpage

1996-03-20 00:00:00 - Claire - (mguarini@clark.net)


Didn't it seem like Claire was in the jungle when the picture was taken? This would fit with Dean Stockwell's comment that someone else was there at the time of the photos. It may not have been Claire, but it may narrow the remaining suspects to other photographers covering that area. That way, Tom may actually know who the other photographer is, but he just hasn't realized it yet. The Organization may want Tom to identify the other photographer so they may discredit/take away that person's life.

1996-03-21 00:00:00 - Re: Claire - (adamsan@bu.edu)


mguarini (mguarini@clark.net) wrote: : Didn't it seem like Claire was in the jungle when the picture was taken? : This would fit with Dean Stockwell's comment that someone else was there : at the time of the photos. It may not have been Claire, but it may narrow : the remaining suspects to other photographers covering that area. That : way, Tom may actually know who the other photographer is, but he just : hasn't realized it yet. The Organization may want Tom to identify the : other photographer so they may discredit/take away that person's life. I'm not sure, but I don't think Clare was a photographer, I think Tom said she wrote. Interesting and his dog Spot, heads of employment for the A.P.

1996-03-21 00:00:00 - Re: Claire - (Steve <ss@randomc.com>)


mguarini wrote: > > Didn't it seem like Claire was in the jungle when the picture was taken? > This would fit with Dean Stockwell's comment that someone else was there > at the time of the photos. It may not have been Claire, but it may narrow > the remaining suspects to other photographers covering that area. That > way, Tom may actually know who the other photographer is, but he just > hasn't realized it yet. The Organization may want Tom to identify the > other photographer so they may discredit/take away that person's life. > >Remember, thats a big clue. When Dean Stockwell said, "you were the only one there with a face", it meant something you know!! TV is the only one with negatives that might id the other Photographer!! That is, he has a face, and we know who he is. Remember that TV had auto wind on his camera. When a Photographer takes one good shot, there are many more in front and back that would be similar. Thus, the fake negs did not, could not have that information. They are hoping that TV will have the other Photographers picture on there somewhere. But furthermore, that is not all they want.

1996-03-22 00:00:00 - Re: Claire - (roses@access1.digex.net)


In article <4ipn12$q1p@clarknet.clark.net>, mguarini <mguarini@clark.net> wrote: > >Didn't it seem like Claire was in the jungle when the picture was taken? >This would fit with Dean Stockwell's comment that someone else was there >at the time of the photos. It may not have been Claire, but it may narrow >the remaining suspects to other photographers covering that area. That >way, Tom may actually know who the other photographer is, but he just >hasn't realized it yet. The Organization may want Tom to identify the >other photographer so they may discredit/take away that person's life. I wonder now if Claire was indeed there--remember the woman bending over the dead rebel? She looked up for a brief moment and Tom photographed her. Was it significant? We'll see. Rose Swicegood