FLM films - My Webpage

1998-01-02 00:00:00 - HE WHOSE NAME (sputters@get.off the net) (was "Re: chris@magnacom") - (jaboe@usa.net)


To reach me via e-mail, my | On Fri, 02 Jan 1998 09:45:28 GMT, sputers@ address is jaboe<AT>nyx<DOT> | gte.net sputered (misspelling intentional) nyx<DOT>net. The address in | the following: the From field belongs to an | => actual username on an actual | => On 1 Jan 1998 14:14:26 GMT, system. However, I lost the | => shannen1134.spam.me.and.die.@alpha867. password so any messages go- | => wcoil5720.com (Shannen Bodell) wrote: ing there will NEVER be read | => by anyone. Names are includ- | => >In article <68fcjj$5eo$2@gte1.gte.net> ed in this posting to the | => >you_bich@die.die.die writes: newsgroup, alt.tv.sliders, | => >>From: you _bich@die.die.die for purposes of proper at- | => >>Subject: RE: chris@magnacom.net (Podkayne tribution of quoted posts. | => >>fries) -----------------------------+ => >>Date: Thu, 01 Jan 1998 06:19:59 GMT => > => >>chris@magnacom.net (Podkayne Fries) => >>You bich, you stay here and do not follow me around the Internet => >>fucking with me!!!!!!!!!!! Oh, look! HE WHOSE NAME learned to forge his e-mail address. Hey, sputters, doesn't that constitute threatening e-mail?! It did when I flamed you in postings to the group WITHOUT pro- fanity or threats a few years ago. => ----------------- => I need to apologize for sending my angry posting to this group. You need to apologize for living, let alone getting onto Usenet, let way alone posting to this group. => Even though this person pissed me off I should not have done this => in this group and Is there anyone on the planet with an IQ above room temperature who hasn't pissed you off, sputters?! => I know there are many here who deserve better postings than this => one. I am sorry. We deserve better than you. Period. And, yes, you are indeed sorry. => Keep on Sliding and Our Favorite shows is only weeks away before => it's return! EEEEEEEEEEEEEK!! This can only mean that you are here to stay! EEEEEEEEEEEEEK!! EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK!! The horror! The utter cluelessness! The suffering that the non-brain-dead will undergo! => --------------------------------------------------------- => Steven S. Palmer <sputers@gte.net> => - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - => "I'm sick and tired of having to rearrange my life => because of what the STUPIDEST people *might* do or => how they *might* react." => -- Bill Maher I'm sure Bill had you in mind when he said this. I know that I did when I put it in MY sig several months back. Never try to teach a pig to sing. It only wastes your time and annoys the pig. That also applies to reasoning with sputters. James -- "It is the triumph | Well, I have to settle for the small of reason to get | victories. I am not nearly rational on well with those | enough to suffer fools gladly. I think who possess none." | it only encourages them.

1998-01-03 00:00:00 - Those here with no respect for others - (_sputers@gte.net)


On 2 Jan 1998 14:15:23 -0700, jaboe@usa.net (James Boe) wrote: >To reach me via e-mail, my | On Fri, 02 Jan 1998 09:45:28 GMT, sputers@ >address is jaboe<AT>nyx<DOT> | gte.net sputered (misspelling intentional) >nyx<DOT>net. The address in | the following: >the From field belongs to an | => >actual username on an actual | => On 1 Jan 1998 14:14:26 GMT, >system. However, I lost the | => shannen1134.spam.me.and.die.@alpha867. >password so any messages go- | => wcoil5720.com (Shannen Bodell) wrote: >ing there will NEVER be read | => >by anyone. Names are includ- | => >In article <68fcjj$5eo$2@gte1.gte.net> >ed in this posting to the | => >you_bich@die.die.die writes: >newsgroup, alt.tv.sliders, | => >>From: you _bich@die.die.die >for purposes of proper at- | => >>Subject: RE: chris@magnacom.net (Podkayne >tribution of quoted posts. | => >>fries) >-----------------------------+ => >>Date: Thu, 01 Jan 1998 06:19:59 GMT >=> > >=> >>chris@magnacom.net (Podkayne Fries) >=> >>You bich, you stay here and do not follow me around the Internet >=> >>fucking with me!!!!!!!!!!! > > Oh, look! HE WHOSE NAME learned to forge his e-mail address. > Hey, sputters, doesn't that constitute threatening e-mail?! > It did when I flamed you in postings to the group WITHOUT pro- > fanity or threats a few years ago. > -------------------- I am dealing weith Life And Death Issues about subjects in other news groups and people with no respect for others butt in. Is it too much to ask for people to respect others that are trying to get help and get things accomplished without other people being rude and causing distress? I work with information dealing with very serious issues and the people interested in the subjects certainly do not need to be harassed by anyone that has no business in those groups or subjects. Is this too much to ask? ----------------------------------- Steven S. Palmer <sputers@gte.net> Please visit my site http://home1.gte.net/sputers/index.html http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/Spa/4001/ ------------------------------------------- Key ID 0x69D430FB Key fingerprint = A706 43EC 13B6 D8E4 9F19 F2D4 63A8 E71D 69D4 30FB Public Key located in the Public Key Directory at: <http://www.pgp.com/> or e-mail with Public Key as the subject line - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - "I'm sick and tired of having to rearrange my life because of what the STUPIDEST people *might* do or how they *might* react." -- Bill Maher

1998-01-03 00:00:00 - Re: Those here with no respect for others - (mcginn@direct.ca)


_sputers@gte.net wrote: > I am dealing weith Life And Death Issues about subjects in other news groups >and people with no respect for others butt in. Is it too much to ask for >people to respect others that are trying to get help and get things >accomplished without other people being rude and causing distress? I work with >information dealing with very serious issues and the people interested in the >subjects certainly do not need to be harassed by anyone that has no business >in those groups or subjects. Is this too much to ask? The only abusive email I've seen here is the one from you (and you've "cried wolf" before, about posts that could hardly be called abusive). You seem to enjoy doing that which you forbid others. Furthermore, who are you to decide who does or does not have any business in various net resources? Joe